I agree Vince - the alignment is the killer in this case - probably a jig 
and reflow over or hot plate is the only option - I don't think hand solder 
in this case is an option or you way better than the average user at doing 
this if you can.

Dave

On Monday, August 25, 2014 12:08:25 PM UTC-5, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
>
> On Monday, August 25, 2014 10:09:35 AM UTC-5, monahanz wrote:
>>
>> soldering two SMD connectors to an S100 board is not that hard.
>>
> The part I find completely agonizing about that board is its TWO 
> connectors on two rigid PCBs..
>
> I pretty much LOL at surface mount since I've been doing it for RF stuff 
> since the 80s and I find it easier than thru-hole but to attach both 
> connectors with less than perhaps 0.1 mm accuracy to smoothly attach would 
> require me to build a little aluminum mounting jig or something.  Maybe for 
> the price of those boards it would be cheaper to milling machine away the 
> PCB so I could plug connectors into a machined board, then lay the board on 
> top of the S100 card, then solder the connectors to the S100 board while 
> its plugged in to the sacrificial board.
>
> See if it was just one connector, then misalignment isn't an issue.  Or if 
> one connector (or both) was a short cable.  Or if via the peculiarities of 
> the board we could get away with just one connector and not install the 
> other.  Or if a thru-hole connector were available.
>
> I imagine soldering in both connectors and they look visually lined up but 
> the board won't physically plug in.  Not enough just to get one connector 
> with no opens/shorts but to get two in perfect alignment.  No trapezoids or 
> parallelograms, perfect distance apart, etc.
>
> Maybe use screw holes first to mount it and don't start soldering until it 
> lines up and then hope it doesn't shift at the final removal?  Or is there 
> a technique involving superglue?  Given the price of indium solder I don't 
> like the idea of using it to attach the two connectors but that stuff and 
> the hot plate / frying pan technique might work.  Then the solder on the 
> board might not melt while I'm attaching the connectors.
>
> I'd like to see a proto-ish board that has the 6502-ish logic to give and 
> receive control of the bus.  Everything but the 6502 and its support.  Then 
> solder in a "fill in the blank" that manipulates the S100 bus lines by 
> either hardware (and glue) or software (and I/O pins) to connect a CPU.  I 
> have to think for a second, certainly you need less than 100 I/O lines to 
> talk S-100.  And to talk CPU-ish takes less than 40 pins.  So more than 24 
> I/O pins but less than 40 to talk?
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"N8VEM-S100" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to