I seriously doubt that - it is a 100 pin connector with pins that are 0.8mm 
apart - you are not going to find anything that can do that with 0.1in 
spacing thru hole.  Again I don't see the point of trying to put modern 
32/64 bit processors on a crippled bus.  I think what we really need is to 
stabilize what we have and make sure there is supporting software.  I am 
not seeing many people in this group writing software (sure like soldering 
boards) or the 68K issue would have been surfaced a lot sooner.  I still 
have not gotten IDE to work with it yet.  I am not sure it is software or 
hardware but I am strongly leaning to the latter.  I am in the process of 
verifying my software on the mini-68K ECB which I know the IDE port works 
on as I have used it with John C's software.  Once I confirm that my code 
works there and not on the S100 version then I will know for sure.  

Dave

On Sunday, August 24, 2014 11:01:07 PM UTC-5, monahanz wrote:
>
> I suspect for the mating board connector there is an equivalent plated 
> through connector.  There are so many  of these thing s these days there 
> almost has to be one.   
>
>  
>
> As to speed, I looked at the Pi, it runs at 700MHz, this one is at 1GHz.   
> At that speed assembler driven ARM  code  should have absolutely no trouble 
> interfacing the S100 bus.  A high level language, possibly. It may require 
> data latches on the S100 bus, but I don’t see why one would not use ARM 
> assembler for key interfaces.
>
>  
>
> John
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* [email protected] <javascript:> [mailto:
> [email protected] <javascript:>] *On Behalf Of *yoda
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 24, 2014 2:40 PM
> *To:* [email protected] <javascript:>
> *Cc:* [email protected] <javascript:>; [email protected] <javascript:>
> *Subject:* Re: [N8VEM-S100:5018] An ARM CPU on the S100 bus
>
>  
>
> That mating board has SMT connector - so I don't see where you make sense 
> here and John that sample mating board has not through hole connectors so I 
> don't see how you would connect it.  I have looked at several boards like 
> this and they base board brings out connection to headers parallel to the 
> board that allows small modules to plug into it.  They generally don't have 
> pins perpendicular to the base board so it is not friendly to mounting to 
> another bigger board.  You can get the connectors like on the base board to 
> mount on the S100 board but they are SMT connectors not thru hole because 
> the pin spacing is much smaller than thru hole.  Look carefully at the 
> specifications of the module and the base board.
>
> On Sunday, August 24, 2014 3:44:47 PM UTC-5, Andrew Bingham wrote:
>
> The mating side of the connector may be SMT only - 
> http://wiki.embeddedarm.com/wiki/File:TS-Socket_connector_photo.jpg
>
> On Sunday, August 24, 2014 1:35:11 PM UTC-7, monahanz wrote:
>
> Dave we would work with the complete board. Just plug it into sockets on 
> the S100 board
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* yoda [mailto:[email protected]] 
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 24, 2014 1:11 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [N8VEM-S100:5012] An ARM CPU on the S100 bus
>
>  
>
> Hi John,
>
>  
>
> The board you are suggesting will probably be a challenge as those 
> connectors I believe only come in SMT style and the alignment of them are 
> very tricky so I don't think you would be able to hand solder them.
>
>  
>
> Dave
>
> On Sunday, August 24, 2014 1:21:35 PM UTC-5, monahanz wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info gb.  Currently I'm leaning toward s the Technologic 
> TS-4900.  See here:- 
> http://wiki.embeddedarm.com/wiki/TS-4900   and 
> http://www.embeddedarm.com/products/board-pictures.php?product=TS-4900 
>
> They offer a mini-board with two 100  pin connectors on the back that 
> would make the placement on an S100 board very nice.  The S100 board would 
> be modeled after one of their "TS-Sockets"  and should in theory allow one 
> to use a number of their "Computer on Module boards".      They supply a 
> free IDE programming interface but somebody told me programming the I/O 
> control lines is not easy.  There are 121 of them. Clearly plenty to 
> control the critical S100 lines  for other S100 board I/O data etc. 
>
> An alternative I've been looking at is the European Olimex line, for 
> example their A13 https://www.olimex.com/Products/SOM/A13/A13-SOM-256/ 
>
> The advantage of them is they are more "hobby" oriented and supply much 
> more information.  The down side is their boards don’t have the connectors 
> on the back. The could be placed upside-down (not great) or perhaps removed 
> and re-soldered. 
>
> Anyway early in the process,  I have currently started on an 80486 S100 
> board which I will do first. 
>
> Everybody out there, please feel free to supply suggestions as to "modern" 
> CPU board you would like to see on the S100 bus.  If a cell phone can 
> contain a powerful computer,  the is no reason our S100 boards cannot be 
> one! 
> John 
>
>
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of G. Beat 
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 7:13 AM 
> To: [email protected] 
> Subject: [N8VEM-S100:5012] An ARM CPU on the S100 bus 
>
> These System-On-Module (SoM) packages offer some interesting capabilities. 
> Ethernet / wireless support and integration on the S-100 card being a BIG 
> Plus. 
>
> Connectivity is replacing most storage media for data/program transfers, 
> such a board could serve the role as a surrogate for other S-100 boards. 
>
> Depending on implementation, an ARM based S-100 board (Linux) could also 
> eliminate the need fir a separate PC to address -- uploads, interfacing, 
> etc. 
>
> Intel's migration to NUC, now in their 4th generation, shows another 
> paradigm shift and options.  It could sit inside a S-100 case -- or 
> attached to back of monitor (VESA), being a super-smart 
> terminal/workstation. 
> http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/nuc/nuc-kit-d54250wyk.html 
>
> gb 
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "N8VEM-S100" group. 
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected]. 
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "N8VEM-S100" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"N8VEM-S100" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to