On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Marc Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Powell > > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 9:26 AM > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Notification commands aren't parallelized? > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:nagios-users- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Emigh > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 8:54 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [Nagios-users] Notification commands aren't parallelized? > > > > > > I'm thinking that I will add a "&" to each notification command to > > > just have them run in the background so that Nagios can continue its > > > queue. Does anyone see any potential issues with this or have any > > > alternative solutions? > > > > Seems plausible and I don't see any immediate reasons why it wouldn't > > work but I'm not intimately familiar with the notification code. I'm > > testing it out and will see what happens when my next notification is > > supposed to go out. > > Seems to work just fine. Next test will be major outage ;) > > > > -- > Marc > I also tried it and the notification was sent properly; however, it still appeared as if the active checks stopped until it completed. Did you notice anything different?
Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
