On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Marc Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Emigh > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 2:01 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Notification commands aren't parallelized? > > > > > I also tried it and the notification was sent properly; however, it > > still appeared as if the active checks stopped until it completed. > > Did you notice anything different? > > No, but the notification finishes so quickly I don't know how I could > tell or if I was having an effect. How are you able to determine this? > > > > -- > Marc > Our notification script connects directly to our mail servers which always hang for at least 5 seconds and sometimes much longer. :) A test could also probably be performed by setting the notification command to "sleep 10". I tried playing with the notification_timeout option again (which worked for me in 2.9), but I haven't had any luck with it working properly in 3.0.1. I set notification_timeout=5, but the notification script still ran for over a minute before I manually killed it.
Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
