-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Meyer, Bruce [09.05.2012 15:33]: > > > HiJacking a thread? What are you talking about? If I had > maintained someone's subject but changed the content, that is > hijacking a thread. Merely hitting 'reply' and deleting the subject > and replacing it, deleting the body and writing my own does not > seem to me, to qualify as hijacking a thread. That is creating a > new thread, by changing the subject and body.
No, it is not. In a mail treated like this, you still have the "In-reply-to" header, in your case it is In-reply-to: <011701cd2c3b$a12b6240$e38226c0$@it.net> When you use software that is able to follow threads, this is thread-hijacking. When you use dumb software, that only lokks for the subject line, this is hidden. > Or am I completely missing something? I do sort by thread on my > machine and my emails are perfectly sorted. Perhaps you should > start sorting my subject instead of X-header or whatever you are > threading on now. Are you broken? Change a mail client because you are not able to enter an email address as a recipient after clicking "New Mail"? - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+qeGkACgkQk33Krq8b42MPTQCeM512Uz8Ue7sNJFkDHViOVNUx srYAniZMWYzY+L4J/prKRlKRJMswrWeO =Dqrp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
