Anyone afraid to have a 9 watt nail service better be afraid to walk out of their home into the sunlight. And is probably afraid of every little thing the media, government and medical community would have them afraid of in order to continue to control their minds.
Whacked. Sent from my Evo. On Jul 22, 2010 9:17 PM, "Jill in Ky" <[email protected]> wrote: I just posted my reply to this stupid "news" story and saw yours (Debbie's) was the first! It's just irritating because 2 weeks ago I tried to get a client to try the Shellac, but she wouldn't. She was afraid because of some news story that said it was bad for you. I grilled her because I hadn't heard about this news story, but she couldn't tell me the details....just that it was bad. Of course I didn't force it on her, but I did tell her I'd look into it to see what the heck she was talking about. So I just forwarded this "news" story to her and told her to read the replies at the bottom and that I was "Ky. nail tech"! Jill Wright Bowling Green, KY On Jul 21, 9:28 pm, Debbie Doerrlamm <[email protected]> wrote: > OK I was just SOOOO ticked off I sat down and responded.. spell > checked, re-read it over to make sure it sounded professional, not > whiny or anything :) I pasted, put in my AIM name, email all that and > clicked.. grrrrr.. its not there.. grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr > > I can only shake my head at wonderment in such poor reporting and > fact finding. Not only does this author have her facts wrong, the one > link she provides to the FDA site specifically says MMA was not > banned. Was there any attempt at all to verify what these "experts" > told Ms. Angelle? > > The opportunity to have your nail polish last more than 2 days, > staying chip free and shiny for as long as two weeks without an > "enhancement" application is an amazing stride in the professional > nail industry. The TV, newspaper, and web press received lately has > kept professional, educated, licensed nail technicians not only busy > at their table, but too often busy correcting gross mis-information > such as presented here. In case you are interested, I am a licensed > NY state Nail professional for 17 years and run a 16 year old > networking portal site for beauty professionals. I personally have > responded to more than one of these mis-informed reports in the past 2 months. > > >>Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has banned methyl methacrylate > but they > <http://www.fda.gov/Cosmetics/ProductandIngredientSafety/ProductInform.. .>state > on their website that "many nail products that contain potentially > harmful ingredients are allowed on the market because they are safe > when used as directed." > >One particularly dangerous ingredient, <http:// http://www.epa.gov/dfe/pubs/projects/salon/nailsalonguide.pdf>a > chemical called methyl methacrylate, can cause shortness of breath > and irritate the eyes and skin. > > FDA article: "No regulation specifically prohibits the use of methyl > methacrylate monomer in cosmetic products." > > That is not to say MMA (methyl methacrylate) is good, indeed it is > bad - bad for the consumer and bad for the nail technician. Almost > every US state has instilled some variation of prohibiting or > outright banning the product for use in the salon environment. MMA in > other industries is used widely daily. > > MMA is NOT safe for use in the salon environment. The product cures > (dries) rock hard and can cause severe damage to the natural nail if > the nail is banged or badly broken. The vapors (smell, fumes) and > dust produced by MMA can cause a laundry list of mostly respiratory > illnesses. Removal of MMA, even a preparation for a "fill-in" of the > enhancement requires an electric file, which is often used with no > proper education. This leads to damage of the nail plate, often > piercing of the nail plate allowing chemicals to seep into the blood > stream. When properly used, an electric file is no more dangerous > than brushing your teeth with an electric toothbrush. Further, MMA is > NOT an issue in any gel product. The issue with MMA is in the acrylic > liquid (monomer) when it is mixed with the acrylic powder for an > acrylic enhancement application. > > >>complaints that gel nails do still chip > well yes that can happen, improper application is the main cause, > abusive use of nails would be another reason. > > >>drowning one's fingers in acetone > Absolutely not - if your nail technician is drowning your finger in a > bowl of acetone, find another technician. Every technician I know - > and I know several thousand - use a cotton ball on the nail with > acetone, wrapped in foil to minimize exposure of the acetone against > the skin or nail. > > If the color selection is lacking, you need to find a technician who > uses a different brand - 2 other brands are available as of today, a > 3rd coming shortly - all major names in the nail game - these other 2 > brands each have over 25 or more colors to choose from. > > >>Avitzur concluded that the patient's gel manicure had caused nerve damage. > Do you have any idea how many gel manicure, gel enhancement or > acrylic enhancement applications are performed daily across the US > and around the world? My personal guestimate would be > 2,449,074 visit salons daily around the world (world population/2) * > (1%) / (14) > > >>Improper use or overuse of a nail file to prepare the nail for > layers of gel can expose sensitive skin to chemicals or infection > This is one, if not the only correct information supplied in this > article. Nail services should not be painful and should never draw > blood. If either happen the consumer should leave and report the > operator to the state agency that oversees their license. > > >>mixing acrylic products with gel products > This is a perfectly acceptable application method when the products > are applied by a properly trained, educated and licensed nail professional > > >>This patient probably didn't have a true gel manicure," says > Avitzur, "but I plan on avoiding them myself and would not recommend > them to others at this point." > As a matter of fact this is quite true to my knowledge. The woman did > not have a "gel manicure, she had an acrylic enhancement with a > possible gel topcoat. I saw the story on the evening news here in NY. > The Dr stated she happened to have the same type of service done just > days prior and said she found out it the salon exaggerated the > service - both women were over charged, lied to and did not get what > they thought they was paying for, neither got a quality service from > a well trained professional. > > >>The ultra-violet light used in tanning beds has been associated > with increased skin cancer risk > To quote Douglas Schoon, internationally-recognized scientist, author > and educator with over 30 years experience in the cosmetic, beauty > and personal care industry. He is a leading industry authority, known > for his technical and regulatory work that has helped shape the > beauty industry. He is Co-Chair of the Nail Manufacturers Council > (NMC), and as <http://www.cnd.com>Creative Nail Design's (CND) Chief > Scientist, was head of the R&D laboratory, QA, and Field > Testing/Evaluation departments for almost 20 years. > "..fluorescent lights office lights put out a tiny amount of UV > light. Between UV nail related salon services, your clients will be > exposed to more UV light from fluorescent bulbs in an office setting > than during the salon service. If they go outdoors at all during the > day, their UV exposure skyrockets. UV nail lamps are not significant > source of UV exposure. To date, I've not seen any scientific evidence > to the contrary and there is no credible scientific information that > suggests these lamps are anything but safe. " > > >>Another option may be to look for a salon that uses LED > This is not a catch-all answer. Gels must have been specifically > formulated to cure (dry) under a LED lamp. If the product was not > formulated to be used under a LED lamp, the natural nails could be > damaged from the resulting exothermic reaction. > > >>but does not require the same level of skill to apply as a gel. > Moreover, the process of removing the polish minimizes exposure to acetone. > Just to be perfectly clear - CND's new hybrid gel-polish is GEL mixed > with traditional nail polish (lacquer) that CURES under a UV bulb > lamp. Other brands with similar products are GEL mixed with pigment. > CND's Shellac is deemed by the company to be PROFESSIONAL USE only. > This means there is a level of skill and knowledge/training required > to properly apply and remove the product. The "remover pads" CND > sells with the system is a variation of the cotton ball/foil method > nail technicians have been using for 15+ years which also minimizes > exposure to acetone - which by the way is the safest chemical we use > in the nail salon. > > Regards, > Debbie ^v^ ^o^ //\o/\\ ^o^ ^v^ Webmaster - System Admin - IDSR > > [email protected] > (AOL or AIM - NailGdsss) > WWWeb Services, Ronkonkoma, NY & Rocky Mount, VA > 631-981-1273 fax 631-981-7557 > ONLINE STOREhttp:// www.beautytech.com/shoppehttp://www.beautytech.com&http://www.beautytech.INFO > for Professionals for Consumers -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NailTech" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]<nailtech%[email protected]> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NailTech" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.
