I have had an increase of questions on this subject from my clients lately.
holly cliffe <[email protected]> wrote: >One of the bigger news shows in Vancouver did a story last night on the risk >of clients ending up with cancer due to over exposure to uv light during gel >manicures. She interviewed a client in a salon having her nails "buffed" >prior to gel polish application. Then she interviewed a dermatologist who >confirmed that there may be an increased risk of malignancy with these >services. Then she talked about a woman who believes her cancer was caused by >the uv lights. At the end of the interview she said that "of course beauty >industry scientists are presenting their own studies to defend their >products". Then she ended the piece without elaborating on that > >This morning I sent her a copy of Doug's study on UV lights and over exposure >suggesting she present a "balanced" approach to the story. She wrote me back >quite quickly to say she had read the study and did present a balanced >approach because the study she referred to in her story was Doug's. She never >elaborated on Doug's study at all.....even though she had the information >right in front of her she focussed on the fear mongering. > >I gotta' say, I don't know how you get a fair shake with these people.....they >have the right info yet they still misrepresent the situation!!!! > >Holly >Holly Cliffe Nail Design > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"NailTech" group. >To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >[email protected]. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NailTech" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.
