>> this statement is somewhat inaccurate. the sc has made no such >> decision. the sc has been listening to the membership on this one, as >> is the sc's wont, and the membership has been pretty divided on it. >> hence the sc has not made a change, but is still open to it. > Randy, thanks for the clarification. > Wasn't this issue supposed to make the last election?
uh, i only hacked a small part of the ballot, the ml committee bit, so did not track as well as i might have. but my memory is that we keep asking it on the survey. you did fill out the survey, didn't you? :) it may be best wait for daytime stateside and let someone with more functional neurons respond. randy
