> On 15 Mar 2025, at 22:46, Brandon Butterworth via NANOG > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 15/03/2025 18:14:01, "Saku Ytti via NANOG" <[email protected]> wrote: >> If we consider personal safety as a more critical analog of infosec. >> Secret service has a budget of 3B, attacker with a budget of a hundred >> dollars can take a shot at the president. This is not a serious threat >> actor, this is the absolute least concern, and still 3B is not enough >> to stop it. Attacker leverage is extremely hard to cover. > > That microphone could easily have been covered in Novichok > > brandon >
That’s the person from Qualys doing the deep *nix hackers having studied the terrain and put thought into it or TAO sneaking about owning microcontrollers in lightbulbs to steal passkey generated session tokens. Unfortunately the massively overwhelming proportion of “computer crime” is folk getting robbed on the street who were told they were safe. > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/226GTY26CIMHDZYJX477ZGOCJW6XVKOM/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/GSHKAEDYZLXRFWJCD2NUNK3BSHJ7MWDD/
