On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 at 00:45, Brandon Butterworth <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 15/03/2025 18:14:01, "Saku Ytti via NANOG" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >If we consider personal safety as a more critical analog of infosec. > >Secret service has a budget of 3B, attacker with a budget of a hundred > >dollars can take a shot at the president. This is not a serious threat > >actor, this is the absolute least concern, and still 3B is not enough > >to stop it. Attacker leverage is extremely hard to cover. > > That microphone could easily have been covered in Novichok
Yes, we are good at that in nanog. Whenever someone has massive outage, it was simple to address, if they just had been as good at their job as we are here. So problems appear to be simple, cheap and easy to address, if resources can be pulled from nanog-ml. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/I2KRI3HCJKBN26KVMUVWNQYB5HOHOZF5/
