> On Dec 1, 2025, at 10:55 AM, Josh Luthman via NANOG <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I need a business reason to make the business do IPv6. I do not need a > technical reason. This thread has shown there is no business use case for > global IPv6. > > I also want to throw this out there: Metronet residential (last I heard > 7th largest fiber provider in the US, this was well before the Tmobile > acquisition) doesn't even give out public IPs. They do IPv4 only CGNAT. > You can get a /32 static at $15/mo (in some areas).
They also turned off IPv6 in networks they acquired, which is sad. I know it caused some of the more technical people I know to leave their service, not that is a business case, but it’s a churn case. - Jared _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/QMQHVM4OHOW5ANPMPC7MJKDPJIEIM3Q4/
