On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 2:48 PM Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I don't think, really, there was ever any REAL hope that 100.64 was
> > going to be used for anything except 'more rfc1918'.
>
> my memory is that was the actual plan and justification. specifically,
> i think it was the cable folk who wanted it; but i am less sure of that
> part.
yup! basically:
"Hey, everyone of our customers uses like 10/8 and 192.168/16
and.. can't we have an answer which isn't their internal space?
for our internal space?"
great times.
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/5IEKX6HBPWLCF5BW3AMVI3PI4LGI5QWA/
