On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Phil Rosenthal wrote: > > Hello Alex, > > I'd say this sounds obvious, but may be deceptively so... > If you are taking a pipe capable of 1000 mbit, and rate-limiting it to > 311 mbit, the logic used may be: > > In the last 1000 msec have there been more than 311mbits? If yes: drop. Except, we're at the levels of 100 kbit/second in our tests. I did just find CSCdr94172, which might be related. -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
- fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Phil Rosenthal
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Phil Rosenthal
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein
- Ok, I give up - Pipeline 75 Dennis L. Shreve
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet li... Scott Weeks
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Marshall Eubanks
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Sush Bhattarai
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Vincent J. Bono
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Martin Hannigan
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Paul Vixie
