: A cisco ping is not bursty, to the extent of hundreds of mb/s. Also, cisco : ping doesn't offer 4,000 pings/sec. No, but you can start 6 simultaneous sessions to the router and have 5 of them pinging the other side of the circuit while looking at the 6th session to watch for traffic levels and errors. You'd be surprised how much traffic you can push when you set the packets to as big as you can and as fast as you can. I don't know how bursty a traffic pattern this would create, though. scott
- fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Phil Rosenthal
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Phil Rosenthal
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein
- Ok, I give up - Pipeline 75 Dennis L. Shreve
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet li... Scott Weeks
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Marshall Eubanks
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Sush Bhattarai
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Vincent J. Bono
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Martin Hannigan
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Paul Vixie
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Rafi Sadowsky
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Peter John Hill
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Peter John Hill
