Henry Linneweh wrote:
are there any better tools that will accmoplish the same thing for win2k/xp users
If I would have to name one tool which would be more technically sound than RealMedia
or WindowsMedia, I would have pick Cisco�s IP/TV. With all it�s issues, at least
the it behaves well in varying network conditions, which cannot be said from
either WM or RM.
However, both RM and WM behave well in a robust, close-to-zero packet loss
environment when the horribly broken RM�s retransmission algorithm nor
the highly inefficient fragment-spitting of WM do not kill your media experience.
Unfortunately in this, as in so many other cases, technical competency has nothing
to do with product success.
Pete
-Henry
*/Petri Helenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
William Caban wrote:
>Are NANOG meetings webcasted? More specifically, Is NANOG29 going to be >webcasted/multicasted/netcasted? > > > NANOG meetings have typically very narrowband realmedia stream sent.
Pete
