Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings

[Petri Helenius]

Brandon Butterworth wrote:

the it behaves well in varying network conditions, which cannot be said 
from either WM or RM.
   

Quality of the link from encoder to Real server is important, send
garbage to the server and it has nothing to distribute.
 

One can screw it up earlier than that, send garbage to the encoder and 
it spends 90%
of the available bandwidth encoding noise.

I get the impression it's done in band with other NANOG traffic and may
be suffering against the warez traffic.
 

Diffserv anyone?

Pete