Joe Rhett wrote: > > You do know how to spell assumption, right? > > They might have some very good reasons why they believe it isn't an issue, > or that they have worked around. Why don't you ask, rather than spell? We did. They repeated their answer: We don't do MD5 currently. So the customer is exercising his inalienable rights. And this loss of $200k+ in revenue helps Winstar how? BTW, I see you're right on top of the thread which I thought died some while ago. -- Rodney Joffe CenterGate Research Group, LLC. http://www.centergate.com "Technology so advanced, even we don't understand it!"(R)
- Re: Xspedius / E.Spire as wellRe: Winstar says ... Charles Sprickman
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Joe Rhett
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerabil... Rodney Joffe
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulner... Dan Hollis
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vu... James
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vu... E.B. Dreger
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BG... Pekka Savola
- Re: Winstar says there is no T... E.B. Dreger
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulner... Joe Rhett
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vu... Rodney Joffe
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BG... Kevin Oberman
- Re: Winstar says there is no T... Rodney Joffe
- Alternatives to MD5 [Re: Winstar says there is no TC... Pekka Savola
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Alexei Roudnev
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerabil... James
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulner... Deepak Jain
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vu... James
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vu... Dan Hollis
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BG... Daniel Senie
- Re: Winstar says there is no T... Christopher L. Morrow
