Kevin Oberman wrote: > > And this loss of $200k+ in revenue helps Winstar how? > > Education? That was my point. Apparently not. A week or more ago, they knew that was the next stop. They ignored it. So they were not in need of education. Hence my original question - in the *real* world, was there another solution. In *this* specific situation where you were limited in forcing peers to do anything upstream. If there was an OT list, we should have been there already. So lets just kill it here ;-) -- Rodney Joffe CenterGate Research Group, LLC. http://www.centergate.com "Technology so advanced, even we don't understand it!"(R)
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Joe Rhett
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerabil... Rodney Joffe
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulner... Dan Hollis
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vu... James
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vu... E.B. Dreger
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BG... Pekka Savola
- Re: Winstar says there is no T... E.B. Dreger
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulner... Joe Rhett
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vu... Rodney Joffe
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BG... Kevin Oberman
- Alternatives to MD5 [Re: Winst... Rodney Joffe
- Alternatives to MD5 [Re: Winstar says there is no TC... Pekka Savola
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability Alexei Roudnev
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerabil... James
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulner... Deepak Jain
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vu... James
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vu... Dan Hollis
- Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BG... Daniel Senie
- Re: Winstar says there is no T... Christopher L. Morrow
- Re: Winstar says there is ... Patrick W . Gilmore
- RE: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability McBurnett, Jim
