In a message written on Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 06:25:52PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > All I hear is how this company or that enterprise "should qualify" for > PI space. What I don't hear is what's going to happen when the routing > tables grow too large, or how to prevent this. I think just about > anyone "should qualify", but ONLY if there is some form of aggregation > possible. PI in IPv6 without aggregation would be a bigger mistake than > all other IPv6 mistakes so far.
I find it interesting that no operators are screaming that there will be
too many routes, but that all the IPv6 researchers are bringing forth
this view.
8 years too late guys. We've figured out table management.
--
Leo Bicknell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.tmbg.org
pgpoiI7os23h2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
