>> o with sbgp, the assertion of the validity of asn A announcing >> prefix P to asn B is congruent with the bgp signaling itself, >> A merely signs the assertion in the bgp announcement. > >> o with sobgp, the assertion is in an external database with >> issues such as > > This is nonsense. Did you even read the soBGP drafts?
yes > In S-BGP the certificates are carried in path attributes, in soBGP in > a new BGP message. Other than that, they do not differ in this regard. you are confusing certificates and the attestation of routing policy. > Do I hear you say that S-BGP is less complex than soBGP?? yes randy
