On 4 mar 2006, at 17.43, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:59:18 +0100
Kurt Erik Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3 mar 2006, at 04.13, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I would be surprised if Shim6 going into actual deployed boxes was
any faster. So, if Shim6 was finalized today, which it won't be,
in 2010 we might have 70% deployment and in 2012 we might have 90%
deployment.
OTOH Teredo, which isn't even a standard is in more or less all
Windows XP boxes....
Teredo is described in RFC 4380; it's a Proposed Standard.
Duh. Given I was part of the discussion of which prefixes to use in
the document I should have remembered that...
Still it was deployed way before that.
- kurtis -
