-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Mark Kent wrote: > virendra rode wrote: >>> This is yet another reason one shouldn't rely on pings & traceroutes to >>> perform reachability analysis. > > So, you're in the "traceroute is not important" camp? > (you'll note that in my email I did ask whether we think > traceroute is important) - ---------------------------- I'm sure its important. All I'm saying is, icmp can get rate-limited (many times it does) which could possibly lead to packet loss and even drops while traversing hops. regards, /virendra > > Mark Smith wrote: >>> The non-announcers, because they're also breaking PMTUD. > > Really? How? Remember, we're not talking about RFC1918 space, > where there is a BCP that says we should filter it at the edge. > We're talking about public IP space, that just doesn't happen to be > announced outside of a particular AS. > > Thanks, > -mark > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFFyejpbZvCIJx1bcRAsFXAKDokAbujtIiuvGDXss2Tt5U3CXElQCgkpKG UaS6MDxtWKjdbiLewujDs/Q= =qgo2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
