On Mon, 21 May 2007, Roger Marquis wrote: > > Except that there's a lot more to this pattern than simply changing NS > at a rate other than normal, enough that it can be easily identified > for what it is. I'm not in the mood to argue, but 'do tell'. Perhaps someone from ICANN will implement this in policy for the TLD folks to use.
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Joe Abley
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Simon Waters
- RE: Interesting new dns failures michael.dillon
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Edward Lewis
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Crist Clark
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Paul Vixie
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron
- Re: Interesting new dns failures David Ulevitch
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron
- Re: Interesting new dns failures David Ulevitch
