apropos of this... > >>As to NS fastflux, I think you are right. But it may also be an issue of > >>policy. Is there a reason today to allow any domain to change NSs > >>constantly?
...i just now saw the following on comp.protocols.dns.bind ("bind-users@"): +--- | From: "Wiley Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind | Subject: Hooray, glue updates are instantaneous! | Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:08:13 -0700 | X-Original-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | X-Google-Sender-Auth: fbac9c128e6c36c7 | | Well, maybe I've been out of the loop for a while but I just changed the IP | address of one of our authoritative name servers on Network Solutions' web | site and it propagated to all the gtld servers within 5 minutes. | | I don't know how this got "fixed" but for all readers out there who may | contributed to making this magic happen, my hat is off to you, and I will | quaff a brew (or more) in your honor as I consider this a significant | contribution to the march of civilization. | | -W Sanders | http://wsanders.net +--- in general, we ought to be willing to implement almost anything if free beer is going to be offered by non-criminal beneficiaries. -- Paul Vixie