On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Sean Donelan wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, James Blessing wrote: > > 1. Revocation of mere conduit status; by inspecting certain content and > > preventing access to it the ISP is doing more that just passing packets > > and is getting involved in the content. > > Its not "content" blocking, its source/destination blocking. oh, so null routes? I got the impression it was application-aware, or atleast port-aware... If it's proxying or doing anything more than port-level blocking it's likely it sees content as well, or COULD. Either way, it's not like it's effective for anything except the m ost casual of users :(
- Re: Network Level Content Blocking (UK) James Blessing
- Re: Network Level Content Blocking (UK) Jeroen Massar
- Re: Network Level Content Blocking (UK) Chris L. Morrow
- Re: Network Level Content Blocking ... Alexander Harrowell
- Re: Network Level Content Bloc... Chris L. Morrow
- Re: Network Level Content ... Matthew Palmer
- Re: Network Level Content Bloc... Leigh Porter
- RE: Network Level Content Blocking (UK) michael.dillon
- RE: Network Level Content Blocking (UK) michael.dillon
- Re: Network Level Content Blocking (UK) Sean Donelan
- Re: Network Level Content Blocking (UK) Chris L. Morrow
- Re: Network Level Content Blocking (UK) Sean Donelan
- Re: Network Level Content Blocking (UK) Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Network Level Content Blocking ... Sean Donelan
- Re: Network Level Content Bloc... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Network Level Content ... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Network Level Content ... Leigh Porter
- Re: Network Level Content ... William Allen Simpson
- Re: Network Level Content ... Deepak Jain
- Re: Network Level Content ... Simon Waters
- Re: Network Level Content ... Iljitsch van Beijnum
