Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Interestingly, nobody has mentioned on the list what the offending content is yet. Or why this would even remotely be a good idea. I would think that if the content in question is legal, ISPs and the government shouldn't touch it, and if it isn't, law enforcement should do something about it.
It was in http://publicaffairs.linx.net/news/?p=497 "images of child abuse" "voluntary" "co-operation" "At present, the government does not propose to require UK ISPs to block content and our policy is to pursue a self-regulatory approach wherever possible." "However, 90 per cent. of connections is not enough...."
