Once upon a time, Paul Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I deliberated for a while on whether to send this, or not, but I figure it > might be of interest to this community: > > http://techliberation.com/2008/12/04/telecom-collapse/
One thing doesn't make sense in that article: it talks about POTS being subsidized by other services, and people cutting POTS lines. Wouldn't that be _good_ for the companies and their other services? The way the article describes things, fewer POTS lines = smaller subsidies taken from other services = better profits for other services and the company. -- Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
