Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Paul Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
I deliberated for a while on whether to send this, or not, but I figure it
might be of interest to this community:
http://techliberation.com/2008/12/04/telecom-collapse/
One thing doesn't make sense in that article: it talks about POTS being
subsidized by other services, and people cutting POTS lines. Wouldn't
that be _good_ for the companies and their other services? The way the
article describes things, fewer POTS lines = smaller subsidies taken
from other services = better profits for other services and the company.
the lines are still there and still require maintenance so they loose
money on it.
