Skeeve Stevens wrote: [please fix your line length, my screen is still not a 100"]
> Owned by an ISP? It isn't much different than it is now. > > As long as you are multi-homed you can get a small allocation (/48), > APNIC and ARIN have procedures for this. > > Yes, you have to pay for it, but the addresses will be yours, unlike > the RFC1918 ranges which is akin to 2.4Ghz wireless.. lets just share > and hope we never interconnect/overlap. > > I can't find a RFC1918 equivalent for v6 with the exception of > 2001:0DB8::/32# which is the ranges that has been assigned for > documentation use and is considered to NEVER be routable. In that /32 > are 65536 /48's... way more than the RFC1918 we have now. Documentation is exactly that: Documentation. Do not EVER use that in a real box. If you need 'RFC1918 alike' space then go for ULA (RFC4193). Also see http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/ula/ for a semi-registered version of that. If you want "guaranteed unique" then go to a RIR. > If I was going to build a v6 network right now, that was purely > private and never* going to hit the internet, and I could not > afford to be a NIC member or pay the fees... then I would be using > the ranges above.... I wonder if that will start a flame war *puts on fire suit*. Google goes straight through that suit, I suggest you use it and read up on IPv6. Even the Wikipedia entry contains this information. google(rfc1918 ipv6) or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network Greets, Jeroen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
