I doubt it. If they use the BAM stuff and launch in October (after World Series) the timing might be right.
Sent from my iCar > On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:06 PM, Ross Tajvar <r...@tajvar.io> wrote: > > Agreed, I noticed the single IX as well and asked them about it in my email. > If they don't expand aggressively in the next ~6 months, they're going to > have a very problematic launch. > >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 5:59 PM Jon Lewis <jle...@lewis.org> wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Ross Tajvar wrote: >> >> > Yeah, I'm going to send them an email and see if I can get ahold of their >> > peering policy. >> > I'm hoping they will update it as they get more attention from other >> > networks. They may just be procrastinating >> > setting things up. According to bgp.he.net they are only announcing one v4 >> > /24 and one v6 /48, which could be >> > enough IPs, but seems a little on the small side. >> >> I'd be much more worried about only being on one IX than only advertising >> a single /24 and /48. I'm guessing they've just not fully fleshed out the >> peeringdb entry and maybe not fully built out the network infrastructure >> yet. A CDN, with everything coming from one POP in NY is not going to cut >> it. >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route >> | therefore you are >> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________