On 7/11/19 12:05 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 3:04 PM Peter Beckman <beck...@angryox.com> wrote:
"with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of
value"
Kind of a huge hole that, unless you record all calls which opens other
liability, is hard to prove.
I'm not sure that the cited code works for this case, agreed.
I'm also not a lawyer :)
I'm a chemical engineer.
I used to think that email spam was a law enforcement problem too, but
it's become very clear that law enforcement has little to no interest in
solving geeks' problems.
Mike
