Agreements were already sent to Spamhaus and from there were transferred to Jan Vermeulen, the "friend" of Ronald, unfortunately Ronald decided that they are "forged" because they have the same police stamp in the same position (these are not different documents, but the same single document that on each sending to Spamhaus, the other non-relevant netblocks were grayed-out)
Regarding: "No one with half a brain even skimming this thread will conclude that you're innocent in this matter" Can you please write based on what you are writing it? (we will very appreciate facts and not opinions) ________________________________ From: Matt Corallo <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 2:35 PM To: Elad Cohen <[email protected]> Cc: Ronald F. Guilmette <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Elad Cohen Come on dude, you could just respond with the requested LoAs and purchase agreements and yet instead you threaten lawsuits. No one with half a brain even skimming this thread will conclude that you're innocent in this matter (a lapse in accuracy or two here and there by Mr Guilmette notwithstanding). Take your useless grandstanding elsewhere. Matt On Sep 19, 2019, at 13:18, Elad Cohen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Mr. Ronald Guilmette The way you called us in this forum incessantly, thieves and crooks, is not the right way, this is libel for all intents and purposes, we will not wrangle with you in this forum as this subject was transferred our lawyers. We are sure that in one year, you will not be such a "hero" and a "savior" as you represent yourself today. ________________________________ From: NANOG <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Ronald F. Guilmette <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 2:03 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: Elad Cohen In message <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Florian Brandstetter <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >... this is certainly not a place where you can >slander his name or anyone associated with him in any manner for the >entertainment of everyone... If I have slandered anyone, then I shall bear the price for that, in accordance with law. I have accepted that risk, in order to say what I have said, and I have done so from within the most litigious nation on earth. Meanwhile, if I am right and if Mr. Cohen is wrong, then what price will he pay for his misdeeds, and who will see to it that he receives the justice due him? Mr. Cohen sits with impunity in Israel, and by remote control appears to request his California lawyer, the colorful and storied Mr. Bennett Kelley, to file suit against me, even as Mr. Cohen takes IPv4 space away from legitimate businesses and governmental entities in South Africa, Australia, and Japan, also by remote control, and also with the relative impunity afforded him by his sheer distance from these places. I have risked my neck, my reputation, and my entire bank account in order to call him out, and if you think that I have done so lightly or without evidence you are wrong. Meanwhile, what has Mr. Cohen risked? And who will see to it that he pays an appropriate price, in Israel, if I am right and he is wrong? Regards, rfg
