On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:23 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:11:32PM +0200, > Jeroen Massar <jer...@massar.ch> wrote > a message of 101 lines which said: > > > - Using a centralized/forced-upon DNS service (be that over DoT/DoH > > or even plain old Do53 > > Yes, but people using a public DNS resolver (of a big US corporation) > over UDP is quite an old thing and nobody complained. I really wonder > why there was so little reaction against OpenDNS or Google Public DNS > and suddently a lot of outcry against DoH... > There is only a reaction to changing the defaults of millions of users to key internet infrastructure. As Mao Zedong said, let a thousand flowers bloom. It only got messy when it turned out everyone effectively could only have 1. > > You might also want to look into this amazing thing called Tor if > > you really want privacy. > > I know it, and use it and it is awfully slow. Telling to people who > want privacy that they need to adopt the difficult and costly (in > performance) solutions made for iranian opponents won't help to > improve security. > > > Noting that many ISPs are deploying both DoT and DoH next to Do53. > > Fact-checking: could you name some? (I do not know even one.) >
