Hi, On 01/10/2019 23:24, Warren Kumari wrote: > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:42 PM K. Scott Helms <kscott.he...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> They almost have to change the default since there are (comparatively) very >> few DoH providers compared to DNS providers. > > From the link that Damian sent (emphasis mine): > "More concretely, the experiment in Chrome 78 will **check if the > user’s current DNS provider** is among a list of DoH-compatible > providers, and upgrade to the equivalent DoH service **from the same > provider**. If the DNS provider isn’t in the list, Chrome will > **continue to operate as it does today.**"
can we not also understand this as testing the waters in terms of changes of browser behaviour without user knowledge? and once one's browser uses DoH, how will we be sure that not half of queries (DoH) are going to another server - maybe even google's? slippery slope? PS: in my opinion it would look a lot more not-evil-doing if the same would be done with s/DoH/DoT/ Frank
