That’s a one-time fee for end-users (and it can be as low as $250 unless you need a /40 or more).
If you’re an ISP, then yes, it’s $500 per year if you need a /40 or more (or as little as $250 if you can get buy on less than a /40). Owen > On Dec 1, 2019, at 17:23 , Matthew Kaufman <[email protected]> wrote: > > I get $500, not $150, when I read the price list. > > On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 4:06 PM Owen DeLong <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > You’re saying that there are two networks that are of sufficient > complexity/size/whatever to require PA addressing, yet lack the resources for > $150/year in registration fees? > > I suppose it’s not impossible, but I’m wondering how they afford the other > expenses associated with maintaining such a network. > > Owen > > >> On Nov 30, 2019, at 09:00 , Matthew Kaufman <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I administer two networks that use legacy IPv4 blocks (one also uses an >> allocation from the 44 net) >> >> Both could have IPv6 if it was free, but neither organization has the funds >> to waste on a paid IPv6 allocation. >> >> We should have given every legacy block matching free IPv6 space, because >> early adopters are still sometimes early adopters. >> >> But you’re right, what could have been supported on a volunteer basis is now >> a profit center. Especially for IPv6, which is once-and-done if sized >> properly. >> >> Matthew Kaufman >> >> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> If the commitment really was to spread IPv6 far and wide IPv6 blocks >> would be handed out for free, one per qualified customer (e.g., if you >> have an IPv4 allocation you get one IPv6 block free), or perhaps some >> trivial administrative fee like $10 per year. >> >> But the RIRs can't live on that. >> >> We have put them under the management of a group of five organizations >> which are very dependent on the income from block allocations and no >> doubt were hoping IPv6 allocations would be a boon since there will be >> very little if any income growth from future IPv4 block allocations. >> >> Worse, once acquired an IPv6 block has so many billions of addresses >> very few if any would ever need another allocation so it would hardly >> act as a loss leader. >> >> I realize many still would not deploy IPv6 for various reasons such as >> their equipment doesn't support it or they don't have the in-house >> expertise to support it, etc tho I can't think of much other etc, a >> few points of resistance do come up. >> >> -- >> -Barry Shein >> >> Software Tool & Die | [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> | http://www.TheWorld.com <http://www.theworld.com/> >> Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD >> The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo* >
