First we moved the entire internet to TCP/443. Now we propose moving it all to UDP/53.
What’s next? Why not simply eliminate port numbers altogether in favor of a single 16-bit client-side unique session identifier. Owen > On Feb 21, 2020, at 15:20 , Matthew Petach <mpet...@netflight.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020, 13:31 Łukasz Bromirski <luk...@bromirski.net > <mailto:luk...@bromirski.net>> wrote: > > [...] > > Now… once we are aware, the only question is — where we go from here? > > — > ./ > > > Well, it's clear the UDP 443 experiment wasn't entirely successful. > > So clearly, it's time to use the one UDP port that is allowed through at the > top of everyone's ACL rules, and update QUIC in the next iteration to use > UDP/53. > > *THAT* should solve the whole problem, once and for all. > > ;) > > Matt >
