On 21/Apr/20 08:51, Matt Corallo via NANOG wrote: > Instead of RIRs coordinating address space use by keeping a public list which > is (or should be) checked when a new peering session is added, RPKI shifts > RIRs into the hot path of routing updates. Next time the US government > decides some bad, bad, very bad country should be cut off from the world with > viral sanctions, there’s a new tool available - by simply editing a database, > every border router in the world will refuse to talk to $EVIL. This keeps coming up. If a ROA disappears, RPKI state reverts to NotFound. Unless dropping "NotFound" is now BCP, I think we'll be okay. Mark.
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Baldur Norddahl
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Alex Band
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Matt Corallo via NANOG
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" t... Christopher Morrow
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Matt Corallo via NANOG
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Rubens Kuhl
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" t... Matt Corallo via NANOG
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" t... Danny McPherson
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?&qu... Warren Kumari
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Baldur Norddahl
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Matt Corallo via NANOG
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Jay R. Ashworth
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Andrey Kostin
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Danny McPherson
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Christopher Morrow
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" t... Christopher Morrow
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?&qu... Andrey Kostin
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Vincent Bernat
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Andrey Kostin

