On 25/Jun/20 16:45, Christian wrote: > wow. blaming support for IPv6 rather than using cgnat is a huge > stretch of credibility I have no idea what's going through Netflix's mind - it's all, as my American friend would say, conjecturbation on my part. CG-NAT isn't new, and if Netflix are still not able to consider it a "fixed issue", there is probably a reason why that is. Ultimately, reaching out to them and asking their position on the matter seems like a path to an answer. Mark.
- netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Denys Fedoryshchenko
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Mike Hammett
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection Mark Tinka
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detec... Christian
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false d... Mark Tinka
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocker fal... Brandon Jackson via NANOG
- Re: netflix proxy/unblocke... Mark Tinka
- Re: netflix proxy/unbl... Gary E. Miller
- Re: netflix proxy/... Mike Hammett
- Re: netflix proxy/... Brandon Jackson via NANOG
- Re: netflix proxy/... Grant Taylor via NANOG
- Re: netflix proxy/... Sabri Berisha
- Re: netflix proxy/... Grant Taylor via NANOG
- Re: netflix proxy/... Sabri Berisha
- Re: netflix proxy/... Mark Tinka