Didn’t the Dec 2018 CL outage cause waves and even TDM circuits to go down?



Luke



From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+lguillory=reservetele....@nanog.org> On Behalf Of 
Matt Erculiani
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 3:59 PM
To: Darin Steffl <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939

*External Email: Use Caution*
For providers who use the same infrastructure for their IP backbone and 
Ethernet services (as so many do), a large DDoS could disrupt all Ethernet 
services that normally traverse affected links, whereas Waves would be 
blissfully ignorant of such an event. Waves are pretty reliable and will only 
go down as a result of a configuration error, vendor software issue, or 
physical/layer 1 failure, all of which can also affect Ethernet services.

This is especially important if you select a provider that sees excess capacity 
as a wasted operational expense instead of an investment in reliability.

Worth noting that protected Waves do have a "reconvergence" time like Ethernet 
would, but this is typically measured in nanoseconds for shorter distances. 
Your equipment can probably be configured to not link-down during this gap, 
you'll just see some errors or a few dropped packets (subject to your 
provider's specific implementation).

-Matt

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 2:41 PM Darin Steffl 
<darin.ste...@mnwifi.com<mailto:darin.ste...@mnwifi.com>> wrote:
Yes but they're $$$ to have protection. Generally ethernet will be cheaper than 
waves with the added protection.

I'm not arguing for one or the other. Waves will often be cheaper when looking 
at 10G or 100G compared to ethernet. For 1G or less, ethernet might be cheaper 
with some protection already built-in.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 3:31 PM Mike Hammett 
<na...@ics-il.net<mailto:na...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
*nods* There are protected wave services generally available if you wish to 
protect about such things.


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP<http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
________________________________
From: "Darin Steffl" <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com<mailto:darin.ste...@mnwifi.com>>
To: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net<mailto:na...@ics-il.net>>
Cc: "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com<mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>>, "nanog 
list" <nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 3:08:19 PM
Subject: Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939
The downside to waves are that they're typically not protected. So a cut will 
take you down. If you have 10G Layer 2 ethernet, they often will have redundant 
paths so the only single path that can fail is between you and their first POP 
where they hopefully have redundancy. It can make a big difference when you're 
transporting data hundreds or thousands of miles. The longer the path, the less 
reliable the wave will be as each route mile opens you up to more risk.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 2:25 PM Mike Hammett 
<na...@ics-il.net<mailto:na...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
I suppose it depends on your carrier and their capabilities.

I much prefer waves to any kind of service that you can aggregate. Being able 
to aggregate just means they're going to oversubscribe you and at some point, 
you'll not get what you're paying for. Can't do that on a wave.


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP<http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
________________________________
From: "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com<mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>>
To: "Forrest Christian (List Account)" 
<li...@packetflux.com<mailto:li...@packetflux.com>>
Cc: "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 2:25:46 AM
Subject: Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939
For small ISPs looking at setting up their first ever presence at an IX point, 
you almost certainly would not be ordering an actual 'wave' (eg: a specific 
DWDM channel on a legacy 10G DWDM platform, handed off to you with 1310/LX 
interfaces at both ends), but lit layer 2 transport service between the carrier 
hotel and your service location.

Pricing for the two types of service can be quite different when you request an 
actual 'wave' from a carrier sales person, vs just lit L2 transport capable of 
large MTUs, QinQ, etc.

The ISP carrying it might take it between those two places as simply a vlan 
trunked through a larger 100G link, as a MPLS circuit, lots of possible things.

Unless you happened to be in a happy conjunction of the right place at the 
right time, and an older DWDM system on exactly the same path you wanted 
happened to have an empty channel and ready to go interface cards at both ends.






On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 11:12 PM Forrest Christian (List Account) 
<li...@packetflux.com<mailto:li...@packetflux.com>> wrote:
Generally one would order a circuit (aka wave) between your location and the IX 
fabric at the interchange if you're not at the site you're wanting to peer at.

For instance, the network I am the network engineer for has a circuit which 
terminates into the Seattle IX (SIX) fabric.   We don't have any other presence 
in Seattle (or Washington for that matter) at this point - our circuit connects 
directly to our port on the Exchange.   We're considering adding a similar link 
to another exchange point somewhere to the east or southeast of us.   I haven't 
looked at the graphs recently, but it's not uncommon for >50% of our traffic to 
come from the exchange.   And yes, we're peered with Hurricane and others there.

We're also looking at dropping 1U or so of equipment in so we can pick up some 
transit as well, but that's a story for a different day about the joys of 
providing internet in the less populated parts of the country.

In your case, it also looks like there are also some peering options at the 
datacenters you are currently at as well.   You may want to do some more 
research to determine how that might work in your situation.   PeeringDB is a 
good resource along with google searches for "peering 100 Taylor" or "peering 
austin data foundry"



On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 9:51 PM <aar...@gvtc.com<mailto:aar...@gvtc.com>> wrote:
Don’t you have to be there to join?

I’m in Austin and San Antonio

-Aaron

From: Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net<mailto:na...@ics-il.net>>
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 7:20 PM
To: Aaron Gould <aar...@gvtc.com<mailto:aar...@gvtc.com>>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939

https://bgp.he.net/AS16527

You don't appear to be on any IXes. Definitely join some IXes before buying 
another 100G of transit.

DFW has a couple and there are some more that are starting up.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/>

Midwest Internet Exchange

The Brothers WISP
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
________________________________
From: "Aaron Gould" <aar...@gvtc.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 6:29:55 PM
Subject: Hurricane Electric AS6939

Do y’all like HE for Internet uplink?  I’m thinking about using them for 100gig 
in Texas.  It would be for my eyeballs ISP.  We currently have Spectrum, Telia 
and Cogent.

-Aaron



--
- Forrest
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>

<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
-- <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
Darin Steffl <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
Minnesota WiFi<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
www.mnwifi.com<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
507-634-WiFi<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
Like us on Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>

<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
-- <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
Darin Steffl <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
Minnesota WiFi<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
www.mnwifi.com<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
507-634-WiFi<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
Like us on Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>

<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
-- <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
Matt Erculiani <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
ERCUL-ARIN<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>

Reply via email to