Why are you emailing me? On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:54 PM Jeff P <[email protected]> wrote:
> SEE!?! > > With no evidence yet publicly acknowledged as to who added the AOC email > to the list now they are just accusing some random "A woman!" > > Words (The Pen) are mightier than any brute force (The Sword). > > And you did it without thought, just piled on. It came as natural to you > as putting on your shoes in the morning. > > JeffP > [email protected] > > > > *Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.* > > NOTICE: > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > Use or dissemination by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please > notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail to correct our records. > Please then delete the original message (including any attachments) in its > entirety, including any backup processes that your system may perform. > Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely > those of the author. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure > or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, > destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender, > therefore, does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the > contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Lorell Hathcock <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:43 PM > Subject: Re: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' Office is on NANOG?? Or, what is > the policy about sharing email offlist? > To: Javier J <[email protected]> > Cc: nanog <[email protected]> > > > A-woman! > > Sincerely, > > Lorell Hathcock > > On Jan 18, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Javier J <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I agree 100%. > > I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine. What I don't > appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address list > because of someone's behavior. > > - Javier > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Jon Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There's a world of difference between "don't expect list posts to be >> private to list members" and "don't forward the list to autoresponders." >> The stupidity of the latter, if it can be tracked down to who did it, >> should result in their removal from the list, at least until they explain >> what caused them to do that and have undone it. >> >> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Paul Timmins wrote: >> >> > The list has public archives. Draw your own conclusions on the policy. >> > >> > https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/ >> > >> > On 1/18/21 2:40 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote: >> >> Not under that impression at all. That's very different from "what is >> the >> >> policy" - at least in the groups I run, if the policy is "no sharing >> >> offlist" and then someone does, there are consequences for that >> someone. >> >> Anne >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law >> >> Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School >> >> Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam >> law) >> >> Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange >> >> Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop >> >> Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS) >> >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route >> StackPath, Sr. Neteng | therefore you are >> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ >> >
