On 19/02/2021 20:11, Tony Wicks wrote: > Because then a large part of the Internet won't work....
Hey, look on the bright side: customers won't be able to use Twitter to complain! :D Ofc, IPv4aaS has many good success stories out there; Sky Italia are running MAP-T, many, many mobile ISPs are running 464XLAT with great success. We're in a situation where making IPv6 a *prerequisite* of your IPv4 connectivity can realistically improve your margins when some sort of CGNAT gateway is a requirement. Yes it requires looking at your CPE support, but if you're doing even 00,000's of subs, I'm sure the benefits aren't trivial when viewed through the lens of the number of connections that a single Chrome tab can happily chew through. -- Tom
