Agreed. Don't fix what isn't broken.
-----Original Message----- From: "Mark Tinka" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 4:33pm To: "Randy Bush" <[email protected]>, "Rod Beck" <[email protected]> Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? On 3/20/21 20:06, Randy Bush wrote: > i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic. > in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in > it being the de facto global anything-ops list. perhaps we do not > need to fix that. Simple. As. That. Mark.
