Yet another peering dispute ending in litigation? From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+ops.lists=gmail....@nanog.org> on behalf of Sean Donelan <s...@donelan.com> Date: Friday, 1 October 2021 at 7:21 PM To: nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: S.Korea broadband firm sues Netflix after traffic surge South Korean Internet service provider SK Broadband has sued Netflix to pay for costs from increased network traffic and maintenance work because of a surge of viewers to the U.S. firm's content, an SK spokesperson said on Friday. [...] Last year, Netflix had brought its own lawsuit on whether it had any obligation to pay SK for network usage, arguing Netflix's duty ends with creating content and leaving it accessible. It said SK's expenses were incurred while fulfilling its contractual obligations to Internet users, and delivery in the Internet world is "free of charge as a principle", according to court documents. [...]
https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/skorea-broadband-firm-sues-netflix-after-traffic-surge-squid-game-2021-10-01/
