Mans Nilsson wrote:
Supplying context you omit:
>>> No, it is the real reason that we still have v4 around.
>> Even more than 25 years after IPv6 became a proposed standard?
It merely means IPv6 is not deployable with the real reason.
> IPv6 is deployable. It is deployed.
If you mean ATM is deployable and was deployed, yes, you are
right. So?
>> After finding that, I, as a theorist, totally abandoned IPv6.
> You gave up, based on false conclusions.
Sorry, but I'm not interested in how you falsely recognize the
real world of practical and theoretical internetworking.
Masataka Ohta
