"For a company like Amazon..." 

True, but also, they're at a size where staffing and operating peering 
operations generously has a negligible impact on the fiscal situation of the 
company (or even department). 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Kevin Burke" <kbu...@burlingtontelecom.com> 
To: "Lincoln Dale" <l...@interlink.com.au>, "Kelly Littlepage" 
<ke...@onechronos.com> 
Cc: nanog@nanog.org 
Sent: Friday, February 4, 2022 3:25:53 PM 
Subject: RE: Amazon peering revisited 



Have gotten into the habit of making annual peering requests to Amazon asking 
turn up a session on a shared IXP peering. Once was able to get a peering 
session turned up, no traffic was ever shifted onto it before we moved out of 
that carrier hotel a year or so later. The amazon peering email box does have 
humans surfing it. 

Over the years a number of network operators have mentioned getting little 
response from Amazon about peering requests. 

For a company like Amazon they have little reason to do peering with small 
scale operators. They already peer with the tier 1’s and assume I will do what 
I need to balance my bits. The fancy algorithms they use to balance traffic 
around does allow them to operate a decent network with fewer staff and less 
links to the small ISPs. Just a network operator here, trying to get my bytes 
across the wire. 

Enjoy your weekend! 


Kevin Burke 
802-540-0979 
Burlington Telecom 
200 Church St, Burlington, VT 



From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+kburke=burlingtontelecom....@nanog.org> On Behalf Of 
Lincoln Dale 
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 12:20 PM 
To: Kelly Littlepage <ke...@onechronos.com> 
Cc: nanog@nanog.org 
Subject: Re: Amazon peering revisited 

                
WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source . Please use proper 
judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to 
this email. 



On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 8:22 AM Kelly Littlepage via NANOG < nanog@nanog.org > 
wrote: 




Hi all, a nanog thread started on November 23, 2018 discussed the challenges of 
getting Amazon peering sessions turned up. Has anyone had luck since/does 
anyone have a contact they could refer me to — off-list or otherwise? The 
process of getting PNI in place with other CSPs was straightforward, but I 
haven't heard back from AWS after a month and several follow-ups. Our customers 
would really benefit from us getting this sorted. 





There are many folks that here that are in AWS. Assuming you have followed what 
is in https://aws.amazon.com/peering/ (and 
https://aws.amazon.com/peering/policy/ ) then send me details privately about 
what/when/who and I'll reach out internally to the relevant folks. 


Reply via email to