On 09/05/2022 00:10, Ray Bellis wrote:

Is there any case law where someone has asserted a database right for a DNS 
zone?

It seems like a rather stupid thing to do. If someone asserted such a
right, I would make sure not to infringe it by ensuring no entries
from that database entered my DNS caches or other software.

It wasn’t the zone itself as such - the concern was use of enumerated zone data 
to then perform bulk collection of Whois data.

Also, I see that in a decision last year the ECJ required "substantial
extraction" also caused "significant detriment" to the investment in
the database.  I'm having trouble coming up with a scenario in which copying
even the entire thing would impair the investment unless they are going to
assert that the structure of the names somehow gave away secrets about their
business plans.

The detriment was scammers sending fake domain renewal notices.

Also, this was 15 or so years ago now…

Many of the ccTLD registries used to be more open about publishing zones and new registrations. Nominet, the .UK registry, took legal action against a few operations that were scraping its WHOIS. The gTLDs also had major issues with fake renewal notices.

https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/nominet-wins-damages-in-data-mining-dispute

Around 2003, many of the ccTLD registries in Europe subsequently went dark on publishing anything other than statistics. Many registrants, at the time, were being hit with directory invoice scams rather than renewal scams.

Outside the US, there has been an on-going shift to ccTLDs since about 2005. In many of these countries, the local ccTLD has more new registations each month than new registrations in gTLDs like .COM/NET/ORG.

With the gTLDs, the domain renewal scams still exist but they are far rarer now. The search engine submission scams seem to have taken over but they are also dependent on old WHOIS data and a lot of them disappeared in 2018 because of GDPR limiting WHOIS data. Some of the European ccTLDs now publish their zones or lists of registations as the legal framework has improved. Most no longer publish comprehensive WHOIS data.

Regards...jmcc
--
**********************************************************
John McCormac  *  e-mail: j...@hosterstats.com
MC2            *  web: http://www.hosterstats.com/
22 Viewmount   *  Domain Registrations Statistics
Waterford      *  Domnomics - the business of domain names
Ireland        *  https://amzn.to/2OPtEIO
IE             *  Skype: hosterstats.com
**********************************************************

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Reply via email to