re: https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-proposes-higher-speed-goals-small-rural-broadband-providers-0
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 7:36 AM Livingood, Jason via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Latency is a limitation for things that are generally relatively low > > bandwidth (interactive audio, zoom, etc.). > > Higher bandwidth won’t solve the latency problem > > +1 > IMO as we enter the 'post-gigabit era', an extra 1 Gbps to the home will > matter less than 100 ms or 500 ms lower working latency (optimally sub-50 ms, > if not sub-25 ms). The past is exclusively speed-focused -- the future will > be speed + working latency + reliability/resiliency + consistency of QoE + > security/protection + WiFi LAN quality. I'd settle for the 100Mbit era having sub 25ms working latency. Which we've been achieving in fq_codel, cake, and even pie, for 10 years. I will file on this nprm, some variant of https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FjRo9MNnVOLh733SNPNyqaR1IFee7Q5qbMrmW1PlPr8/edit But I keep hoping more will sign on board. Perhaps finding a lawyer to proof it. And I'm not sure what hook to use on this nprm out of my existing evolving document without tieing myself to a chair with a variety of calming drugs handy. I'm an engineer, dang it, not a politician! > > Jason > > -- FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/ Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
