On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 9:46 AM William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 4:07 PM Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You could try suggesting IANA/PTI/ICANN to have a different RPKI trust > > > anchor and provide such services to legacy block holders. > > > > the rpki design cabal assumed the iana would be the rpki root. rir > > power players blocked that. so each rir is 0/0. brilliant, eh? > > Which means that all you'd need is a volunteer group with "street > cred" to set up an RPKI for legacy holders and then convince folks to > use their trust anchor too. Or have I missed something?
Merit, perhaps ? But they would need to do a much stricter validation that they currently have in RADB, which is more like Sledgehammer motto "Trust me, I know what I'm doing". Rubens
