Sometimes yes, sometimes no. 

When you go down in density, your fixed cost per customer really escalates and 
you simply can't afford to provision as much as you'd like to. When you leave 
glass as a transport mechanism, scaling isn't easy. When you don't have a 
wireline to the customer prem, scaling isn't easy. 

You might have a licensed backhaul going 10 - 20 miles to feed a remote cluster 
of customers (be it wireless, copper, coax, or glass as the last mile). Those 
are more or less limited to about 1.5 gb/s. Spectrum availability can reduce 
that. You can sometimes stack them, but again, spectrum availability would be 
king in that decision. 
You might have fixed wireless as the last mile. We're starting to see platforms 
capable of multi-hundred megabit per customer with a sector capacity of low 
gigabits, but again, spectrum availability comes into play here. Those 
solutions require line of sight (or close to it) and only go a few miles. The 
systems that can penetrate foliage really cut your per-sector capacity to 
around 100 megabit, shared amongst all customers. Those are simply limitations 
of physics. 




When you don't have the benefits of scale, the only viable path forward in a 
managed setting is usage-based billing, with some amount of included data. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Mark Tinka" <mark@tinka.africa> 
To: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net> 
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 12:44:54 AM 
Subject: Re: FCC Chair Rosenworcel Proposes to Investigate Impact of Data Caps 




On 6/19/23 14:56, Mike Hammett wrote: 




You're assuming that an uncapped service is viable to offer. In many areas, it 
is. In many areas, it is not. 



It is viable for mobile services, even though I think mobile operators have 
taken the model a little too far. 

But for fixed line services, it is mainly used to print free money, or limit 
investment in the network. I'm okay with either model an operator chooses to 
take, because until someone else comes along to break capped services on fixed 
line, there isn't much anyone can do about it. 

Mark. 

Reply via email to