Job Snijders via NANOG writes:
> >
> > > Would it not be advantageous to create at a minimum the 256 of the
> > > 'least-specific' objects?
> >
> > MK: That may be a reasonable approach. Do you see any adverse effects
> > in simplifying the IRR Route creation logic to just have
> > least-specific?
>
> I don't think I see a downside of mapping a single VRP to a single IRR
> route/route6 object.
>
I agree that in ARIN's RPKI-->IRR synthesis, the set of route[6]
objects created should not depend on the maxlength used. In Mark's
phrasing, "just have least-specific."
Ideally, discussion about details such as this should have occurred on
some ARIN technical mailing list in the months leading up to ARIN
deploying this change to production.
Thanks.
Jay B.
